SURFACE TREATMENT · BUILT AROUND YOUR PROCESS+86 133 8622 7681
CHINGYUAN · Resources

Stainless steel vs aluminium passivation

Match metal and product model before assessing passivation.

← All resources

Publisher: Shanghai Qingyuan Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd · Updated:

Stainless steel vs aluminium passivation

Quick answer

Processes for different metals are not equivalent simply because they are called passivation. Confirm alloy grade, surface condition, pretreatment and corrosion acceptance criteria first.

Selection and validation

The catalogue distinguishes QAL-45 for chromium-free die-cast aluminium passivation, QPA-810 for natural-finish stainless steel passivation, and QMg-530A/B for magnesium alloys. Review each against its intended substrate without transferring operating conditions.

Determine the need for degreasing, dewaxing or other pretreatment from contamination and the technical plan. Include rinsing, drying, finish and downstream requirements in trial acceptance.

Before a component trial

  • Alloy grade, finish and actual contamination.
  • Equipment, trial concentration, temperature, time and water quality.
  • Rinsing, drying, downstream requirements and agreed acceptance criteria.

Check documentation: Product models · Certificate and test report originals · Request model-specific TDS / SDS

Related solutions

Metal passivationSilane & conversion films

Confirm model selection and production conditions against component trials and model-specific TDS and SDS.

Discuss your application

The right solution starts with a conversation.

Tell us about your substrate, process and goals.

Talk to our team
Submit your requirements and component photos for follow-up by our sales team.